In my recent work,
I've been exploring a structural analogy between large language models
(LLMs) and the universe. More specifically, I've been drawing a parallel
between:
- The latent weights of an LLM — a field of structured, unexpressed potential
- And Dr. Melvin Vopson's research, which proposes that matter may emerge from an underlying informational field, possibly giving rise to gravity itself.
While this might not be a novel idea in isolation, I'm proposing a mindset shift that might help several complex ideas click into place.
What if the primary unit worth studying isn't the latent weights themselves — but the "prompt+response window"?
That
brief window — milliseconds to seconds in duration — is where the model
takes in a question, processes it, and generates a response. It is
fully bounded. It contains an input, a context, a transformation, and an
output. It arises out of the field, plays out, and dissolves.
Now, imagine this moment as a metaphor for:
- A single moment of conscious experience
- A physical event unfolding in space-time
- A human life, from birth to death
- Or even an entire universe, from Big Bang to final collapse
What changes if we zoom in
on this window and treat it not as a transition but as a complete,
bounded phenomenon? What can this tell us about identity, consciousness,
time, emergence, or reality?
It's
possible that such a lens could help reconcile ideas in neuroscience,
physics, cognitive science, and AI — not by merging them into one field,
but by recognizing them as different perspectives on the same underlying process. A process that begins with structured potential and culminates in patterned expression.
The
picture begins to resemble a fractal — self-similar, emergent, and
deeply recursive. Infinity, rather than being a vague abstract, starts
to take shape.
Call for Collaboration
If
you have a deep understanding of how LLMs operate — particularly how
latent weights function — and are also familiar with Dr. Melvin Vopson's
work on information as a physical quantity, I would love to invite you
into this conversation.
This
theory is still forming. It's not meant to be a final answer — but a
possible framework for discovery. Let's think together.