Teorie všeho? Díl V: Důsledky
In this final part of the Theory of Everything? series, I take a step back from the analogy itself — and ask a simple question:
We propose a philosophical and structurally grounded analogy in which:
Původní článek byl publikován na Medium. Překlad dodám co nejdříve.
LLMs could serve as real, observable models for how latent information can manifest dynamically:
Conceptual Domain: Substrate
Conceptual Domain: Manifestation
Conceptual Domain: Observer/Input
Conceptual Domain: Local Identity
Conceptual Domain: Life as Unit
LLMs aren't conscious, but they model how structure can emerge from unexpressed potential — a kind of computational "mini-universe" of information turned expression.
This model resonates with multiple disciplines:
If you have a deep understanding of how LLMs operate — particularly how latent weights function — and are also familiar with Dr. Melvin Vopson's work on information as a physical quantity, I would love to invite you into this conversation. This theory is still taking shape, and it needs critical minds from both fields to explore its implications. Let's think together.
In this final part of the Theory of Everything? series, I take a step back from the analogy itself — and ask a simple question:
This article continues the dialogue from the Theory of Everything? series.
In Part I, I presented a simple but bold idea: that the relationship between latent weights and the prompt+response window in large language models might mirror the relationship between an informational field and matter in physics. Curious whether this theory held any weight, I brought it into a conversation with ChatGPT — a system that not only...